Contact:
1-866-APSIVA-6
 
@
info@apsiva.com
 
 
     
 

   

Manufacturer Solutions

Consider a typical product information scenario within a manufacturing organization:


Inefficiency in a manufacturing organization

This scenario characterized by disparate product information repositories, manual point-to-point processes and isolated systems, results in huge inefficiencies and data inaccuracy. This is illustrated in the example of a simple product specification change - a modification or improvement to an existing product.

The change is initiated by the Product Manager. Engineering Design are informed of the change and create the new technical design drawings in their CAD system. After the approval process, Production receives the new drawings and begins manufacturing with their PDM system.

Due to the lack of systems and loose processes, marketing are notified late in the process and miss the deadline to include the change in the print catalog. So, the print catalog is printed with old outdated information. IT or an external company is responsible for managing changes to the static web-site. So there is a further delay in communicating this change to them, and for web pages to be updated with the new specification. Customers, who are making purchasing decisions based on the web-site or print catalog are doing so with outdated product information. In addition, since there is no enterprise systems integration policy, the ERP is also not updated with the new specification change.

So, a customer using the latest print or web catalog, attempts to place an order for the product with the old specification. Sales who are servicing the customer with data from the ERP, print or web catalog successfully place the order. Only when the order is communicated to Production, is an alarm raised that the old specification product has been discontinued. The irate customer is informed of the error and cancels the order. In addition, a reseller finds out about the new product informally, and phones Customer Service to inquire. Customer Service cannot find reference to the new specification, resulting in the channel partner being very dissatisfied and frustrated.

The above example highlights the inefficiencies from one perspective. The problem could be many times more costly if the product change was to a regulatory issue, like an MSDS, and was not communicated to the sales channels in a timely manner.

The key problems resulting from managing product information with disparate data storage, manual processes and isolated systems are:

  • Inefficiencies due to manual point-to-point processes. Manual processes are hard to control, making inter-department co-ordination and communication very inefficient.
  • Inaccurate data due to disparate product information repositories
  • Inconsistent brand and product information across various customer touch-points
  • Inability to disseminate product information to channel partners and customers quickly and easily through multi-media channels

The end result of these inefficiencies is a high number of product returns, increasing customer dissatisfaction and lost sales opportunities.

See how Apsiva addresses this problem

     
  Solution Highlights:  
  Central platform
Central repository
Workflow engine
Automatic publish
 
     
  ...................................  
     
  Industry Solutions:  
  Manufacturers  
  Distributors  
     
  ...................................  
     
  Related Solutions:  
  PI Management  
  Process Management  
  Catalog Management  
     
  ...................................  
     
  “ Only 15 to 20 percent of the catalog data of Fortune 500 companies is structured in a way that makes it usable in an e-marketplace. For small to medium businesses, paper remains the dominant catalog format. “

AMR Research
 
     
   
   

Copyright © 2002. Apsiva. All Rights Reserved.